By Maurice A . Finocchiaro
A learn of the relationship among Gaetano Mosca and Antonio Gramsci, keeping that they either belong to an identical political culture of democratic elitism. It argues that Gramsci's political idea is a positive critique of Mosca's.
Read Online or Download Beyond Right and Left: Democratic Elitism in Mosca and Gramsci (Italian Literature and Thought) PDF
Similar history & theory books
The essence of this e-book is a step by step advisor on the right way to build a framework to appreciate family and transactions among kingdom states (under the rubric of `international relations'). Jervis conceptualizes the framework as a world process composed of person devices (nation states) whose transactions and family with different international locations, no matter if bilateral, will have an effect on different countries that aren't without delay curious about the transactions.
“What the longer term fortunes of [Gramsci’s] writings could be, we won't recognize. besides the fact that, his permanence is already sufficiently definite, and justifies the ancient examine of his overseas reception. the current selection of reports is an essential starting place for this. ” —Eric Hobsbawm, from the prefaceAntonio Gramsci is a big of Marxian inspiration and one of many world's maximum cultural critics.
In those vital lectures, amazing political thinker Seyla Benhabib argues that because the UN announcement of Human Rights in 1948, we've entered a part of worldwide civil society that's ruled through cosmopolitan norms of common justice--norms that are tough for a few to just accept as valid on account that they're occasionally in clash with democratic beliefs.
Unprecedented in its breadth and scope, Sovereignty: Frontiers of chance brings jointly a few of the most up to date and most unique writing on sovereignty being performed this present day. Sovereignty’s many dimensions are approached from a number of views and reviews. it really is seen globally as a global query; in the neighborhood as a topic contested among Natives and settlers; and separately as survival in way of life.
- The American Founding and the Social Compact
- Political Research: An Introduction
- The Political Ideas of Leo Strauss, Updated Edition: With a New Introduction By the Author
- Absolutism in Seventeenth-Century Europe
- Political Ontology and International Political Thought: Voiding a Pluralist World
- Idealism, Politics and History: Sources of Hegelian Thought
Extra info for Beyond Right and Left: Democratic Elitism in Mosca and Gramsci (Italian Literature and Thought)
He also offered a vision of such a future society which is sufficiently eloquent and quaint to deserve extended quotation: In his Progress and Poverty Henry George many times quotes an ancient Hindu document which held that splendid elephants and parasols embroidered in gold were the fruits of the private ownership of land. html6/20/2010 3:19:52 PM next page > page_30 < previous page page_30 next page > Page 30 many-sided. Wealth is producing a great deal besides elephants and parasols. But, after all, the privileges that wealth confers on those who possess it come down to the fact that wealth makes the pursuit of intellectual pleasures easier and the enjoyment of material pleasures more abundant.
15 But this is easier said than done. How can Gramsci "be placed in a more living light that transcends" communism? A critical comparison between the thought of Mosca and that of Gramsci may be viewed as one way of doing this. In summary, the interpretation I plan to explore is that an important part of Gramsci's thought (his political theory) is intellectually traceable in a significant though not exclusive manner to Mosca's political theory, at least when the latter is interpreted as an example of the political science paradigm of democratic elitism.
However, there is no question that he regarded invariant regularities as a key criterion of scientificity. " At a more substantive, less formal level, Mosca's principle was meant to offer a better solution to the problem of the classification of governments than the two classic ones attributable to Aristotle and Montesquieu. Aristotle12 had classified governments into monarchical, aristocratic, and democratic, according to whether the supreme power is held by one person, a small group, or the majority.